Christian Mythology

[Dave]

Life after Jesus? Christians endure agony that Jews will never grasp, Rabbi Tovia Singer explains

1- Rabbi Singer is very harsh toward Christians – But he is 100% Jewish
2- Rabbi Singer is very harsh toward Christians – but unlike Walter Veith or Don Patton
He does not lie about Christianity – he just presents the facts – and I agree with his facts

The Facts – Roman Christendom teaches a lie
The Facts – Roman Christendom teaches a Roman Catholic mythology
The Facts – Roman Christendom misrepresents the ahl/OT
The Facts – when Christians realized that their church is an empty message – they throw away all religion

Dave – they throw the baby out with the bath water

People don’t walk away from the church to God
They walk away from church and God

This is the legacy of Roman Christendom - IF there is a God – he is weak or does not care!

THIS IS MY POINT – MY ISSUE – MY MINISTRY
Current events on the world stage are 100% scriptural – fulfillment of scripture
The newest and deepest discoveries within science – overwhelmingly validate scripture
More and more front line scientific thinkers are going on the record – all creation supports an Intelligent Design

But instead of turning to the church – they look for a different “Designer” because of the church

THIS IS MY POINT – MY ISSUE – MY MINISTRY
WEDD + FD-WEDT + INCREMENTAL CREATION simply allows the intelligent to embrace God and scripture


THIS IS MY POINT – MY ISSUE – MY MINISTRY
Rev 12:9 … the great dragon … the ancient serpent, called the devil and satan, who deceives the whole world.

The demonology presented by Jewish King Solomon – is the demonology of the whole world
The Beast of Revelation is the demonology of the whole world
The Beast = the ‘other gods’ wherever they are found in the whole world

Look in India – Greece – Rome – Norse – Africa – South America – North America – Asia – Australia
The Beast = the ‘other gods’ wherever they are found in the whole world
Just because different people of different cultures gave they different names – does not matter

There is only ONE THEOLOGY – it is Jewish Theology
There is only ONE THEOLOGY – after Jesus introduced Himself as the Messiah - there is only Messianic Judaism Theology

Roman Christendom is a different religion that rewrites Judaism to fits it new doctrine that promotes a different god and its mythology is becoming more exposed every day

[Dave]

Glaring Mistakes in the New Testament – How did the Church Correct Them? Rabbi Tovia Singer Responds
11:29 min

The discussion is the infallibility of scripture

Anyone who knows – knows that scripture is riddled with problems
Even the Tanak – Ezekiel is in error against the Book of Numbers

Mat 23:35 And so, upon you shall come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the Temple and the altar.

son of Berechiah – is an error
Does this mean that all of Mathew is error – Robert’s mandate for everyone other than himself

NO – it just highlights that within the agl/NT there are some 65,000 textual differences throughout all the available texts in some 2500 different places.

Some of it = errors in translation
Some of it = insertions by the translator
Some of it = deletions by the translator
Some of it = deliberate corruption

Act 7:16 They were carried to Shechem and laid in the tomb that Abraham had bought for a sum of money from the sons of Hamor in Shechem.

youtu.be/obnjeaSjp6Q
Immanuel's Mother was No Virgin! Matthew Corrupted Isaiah – Rabbi Tovia Singer
Only need the first 7:25 min

Again Rabbi Singer is correct – the Masoretic Text, the Hebrew Bible, does not say Mary would be a virgin – only a young girl

(WLC) H5959 עַלמָה `almah (al-maw') n-f.
a lass (as veiled or private).

Isa 7:14 (KJV) Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

Isa 7:14 διὰ τοῦτο δώσει κύριος αὐτὸς ὑμῖν σημεῖον· ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ ἕξει καὶ τέξεται υἱόν, καὶ καλέσεις τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ Εμμανουηλ·

G3933 – παρθένος - a maiden; by implication an unmarried daughter: - virgin.

Again Rabbi Singer is correct – the Masoretic Text, the Hebrew Bible, does not say Mary would be a virgin – only a young girl

THIS IS PROOF THE agl/NT and the (KJV) is from the Greek
--------------

Mat 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

Mat 1:23 ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ ἕξει καὶ τέξεται υἱόν, καὶ καλέσουσι τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ᾿Εμμανουήλ, ὅ ἐστι μεθερμηνευόμενον, μεθ᾿ ἡμῶν ὁ Θεός.

G3588 - ὁ, ἡ, τό – (he she it) The masculine, feminine (second) and neuter (third) forms, in all their inflections; the definite article; the

Mat 1:23 (TLV) “Behold, the virgin
Mat 1:23 (YLT) 'Lo, the virgin
Mat 1:23 (ASV) Behold, the virgin

Mat 1:23 (KJV) Behold, a virgin – Walter veith made a sinmular argument about the (KJV) deliberately leaving the ‘THE’ out - although a different example

Second issue raised by Rabbi Singer

Mat 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

Mat 1:23 ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ ἕξει καὶ τέξεται υἱόν, καὶ καλέσουσι τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ᾿Εμμανουήλ, ὅ ἐστι μεθερμηνευόμενον, μεθ᾿ ἡμῶν ὁ Θεός.

G2564 – καλέω - Akin to the base of G2753; to “call”
V-FAI-2S = Verb, Future Tense, Active, Indicative Mood, Person: second [you], Number: Singular

Every translation I use (TLV) (YLT) (ASV) (Bishops) and (KJV) all say – they will call him

The Greek NT says – you will call him

Does this prove error in translation – YES
Does this show agl/NT error against the ahl/OT – YES
What does this prove?
Answer – it proves that the Protestant Bible is not letter for letter – word for word – spelling for spelling – or phrase upon phrase – INFALLIBLE
But – not infallible as to Gospel – The Message- The Good News

This also proves why – playing single word games from Greek to Hebrew is error
This also proves why – scripture requires – precept upon precept, line upon line
This also proves why – hanging your entire doctrine around one word – two words – or one verse is simple ERROR