D" N
ow you teach that God’s Grace is not sufficient to save some oneR" What's this verse than mean?
Mr 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:
It reads very clear
1Ti 1:18 ¶ This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;
19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:
20 Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.
And this, who is this Satanas guy that blasphemes? When are you going to show that Satan and Satanas are two different creatures according to you? But not me, the only difference is some Greek prefix....if you bring it back to Hebrew, you get a single stem word, not two different creatures as you claim.
Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
What about this? If your free will sins willfully after you have been saved, you face a judgement, not a pardon AS YOU CLAIM
You deny Scripture.
--------------------
D"
You first – answer the questions asked of you
God sent the angel of death to kill of the first born of Egypt
Why does your god force the angel to sin against God
Please tell me how this angel disobeyed God?R" Why me first? SO you can mock? All over the years I go first and you mock, you hardly write anything about your faith in Jesus?
But you do not support poetry, so how can I explain this to you?
Jews write of metaphors, but not similes? Word games....
www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-metaphor-and-vs-simile/#:~:text=1%20From%20the%20two%2C%20simile%20is%20easier%20to,a%20direct%20comparison%20whereas%20simile%20is%20an%20approximation.
Metaphor and simile are important topics in the field of literature, as such, knowing the difference between metaphor and simile is essential for literature students. Simile and metaphor are figures of speech are made heavy use of in daily lives, especially by public speakers, not only to stress a point but also to make comparisons between objects and people. They are very similar in nature that is why there is a lot of confusion amon g people. Despite similarities, simile and metaphor are totally different which is what this article attempts to prove through examples and their features that will be highlighted here. It is really helpful to know the difference between metaphor and simile to be better able to lace your language with words that work as pearls.
Word games...scholar stuff...
What is a Simile?
One thing to remember is that while a metaphor is of many types, a simile is easy to spot as it is a direct comparison. In a simile, a comparison is made between two objects of different kinds that have however at least one point in common. The simile is usually introduced by such words as like, as or so. Therefore, whenever you spot words like as or like, you can be sure that a simile has been used. If someone says ‘My heart is as clean as a highway,’ he has cleverly used a simile to draw comparison between two very different things. Look at the following examples.
The righteous shall flourish as the palm tree.
In this example, the righteous flourishing is compared to a palm tree using as.
Her face was red like an apple.
Here, the red face is compared to an apple using like.I see , so we use "as" or "like", obvious is it?
Written by me aged 17,
"Love is a river, a dam fed you some,
Clear was it's water, traditionally done."
No hint of 'like' or 'as' here, Therefore no similes either?
Who is "you" here?
Who is the dam?
How does a dam feed water to "you" ?
What is a Metaphor?
A metaphor is an implied simile. It does not, like the Simile, state that one thing is like another or acts as another, but takes that for granted and proceeds as if the two things were one. Thus, when in the example given above he says, ‘My heart is a clean as a highway’ he uses a simile but when he says ‘My heart is a highway’ he uses a metaphor. Here are some more examples for metaphor.
The camel is the ship of the dessert.
He is a lion in battle.What a word game this is? So a metaphor is a less obvious simile....duh, stupid scholars have to invent scholarship to confuse people...we are the dumb , the unlearned...
What is the difference between Metaphor and Simile?
While a simile approximates a thing to another, metaphor treats one as a substitute for another. A metaphor is complete in itself and does not need an explanation. However, you can use one after other similes to explain your meaning. If I say a great book is like a good meal, I am using a simile to let people think that the book is as delicious as a meal. On the other hand, I can use a metaphor to have the same effect when I say that the book is a food for thought. Here, I am using a metaphor as I am not directly comparing a book with a delicious meal but suggesting that the book is great to satiate the hunger of those who read books for this purpose. If I come across a friend who is a voracious reader, the book is not like a meal to him, it is food for him.
A play on word games, using scholarship?
SO in my youthful poem, did I write similes or metaphors?
Who cares?
The dam is a husband.
The you is the wife
The river is love.
Both stories run together as pictures that are able to stand alone by themselves and as parallels of each other.
That is how poetry works.
Now back to this poetry context about God.
The
end of time happens once, at the end of the sin problem, but God wants to make the story into similes so we get the idea of the drama
over sin throughout history. sometime you ignore, controversy A good example of this is Noahs flood and God dealings with the sin problem by destroying the whole earth. Is not God allowed to destroy all living things, after all GOD is the only source of living there is?
Mt 24:37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
If God is able to save people, who cross over from a bad way of living into a new functional way of living, how come only 8 people were saved, and all the animals that breathed? All other sinning creatures died.
In case you think God is mean, how did they die, slowly in agony or rapidly? The fossil record shows it was rapid. God is kind, and there are hardly any fossil remains of the humans, but we ignore the giants don't we? Science thinks we were primitive cave dwelling apes, not giants, big tall and very large in size. Where is the fossil evidence? It's there but not shown, hidden, covered up, explained differently as other creatures of large size, your archons for example.
Back to to angel of death? Who is this?
Ex 12:23 For the LORD will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the LORD will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you.
Ex 12:29 ¶ And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD smote all the firstborn
So who is this destroyer, the YHWH?
H 7843 , lets look up all 136 verses, and see
Jer 2:30 In vain have I smitten your child
hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.
Here is a clue, but its a simile compared to a lion, who is a simile of Jesus or the Opposer (satan)
Jer 12:10 Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard,
Strange Pastors are/can be/ destroyers of the saved.
Jer 51:1 ¶ Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I will raise up against Babylon, and against them that dwell in the midst of them that rise up against me, a destroying wind;
Here is another clue, the ruwach is also a destroyer.
The word ruwach is a medium, so could mean the YHWH destroys via the medium, and this makes more sense to me. In other words the whole of elohiym in heaven is involved in this process.
If elohiym in heaven is destroying things that are dysfunctional, than obviously God hates dysfunctional things, both natural and
moral ra. All of this as a result of missing God's functional powers.
Question: Is God allowed to end things that are RA? Yes
Why are RA things allowed to run in the first place? Because God is kind and loving, and wants to save people trapped in RA. Notice I use RA as a fruit of sin.
So where is the simile in the act of destroying in Egypt?
Re 15:1 ¶ And I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvellous, seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God.
I see Egypt as a simile of the end of the world, and how God saves us from the world at the end of time. The 7 last plagues are similes of Egypt 10 plagues.
There are parallels worth studying.
A parallel is a fancy way to investigate the similes and make an overall story between them.
Question: When GOD takes away your living, which comes from God anyway, is this an act of transgressing the Law of God, no murder?
Ex 20:13 Thou shalt not kill <ratsach>.
Ratsach does not mean kill anyway, it means
no wounding.
Which is a broader term, implies killing, but more deeper than just killing.
Again let's look at all 40 verses of ratsach
V) ,]V (,]V R-TsHh) —
Murder: [freq. 47] (vf: Paal, Niphal,
Pual, Piel, Participle) |kjv: slayer,
murderer, kill, murder, slain,
manslayer, killing, death| {str: 7523}
Nm) ,]V (,]V R-TsHh) —
Wound: A deadly wound. [freq. 2]
|kjv: sword, slaughter| {str: 7524}
Jeff Benner sees this word coming in two forms, the verb and noun form.
Both forms must have the same basic meaning.
Ie wound and wounded
Ps 42:9 I will say unto God my rock, Why hast thou forgotten me? why go I mourning because of the oppression of the enemy?
10 As with a sword in my bones, mine enemies reproach me; while they say daily unto me, Where is thy God?
11 Why art thou cast down, O my soul? and why art thou disquieted within me? hope thou in God: for I shall yet praise him, who is the health of my countenance, and my God.
(KJV)
Depression wounds people, as does the scoffing of enemies. Bullying is another example of wounding.
Wound to the bones is another simile, we should investigate.
Eze 21:22 At his right hand was the divination for Jerusalem, to appoint captains, to open the mouth in the slaughter, to lift up the voice with shouting,
To open the mouth to wound
Wow, so words can wound.
Yashua is a simile of Yashuah both were sinless in their living,
Jos 24:15 ¶ And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
16 And the people answered and said, God forbid that we should forsake the LORD, to serve other gods;
Joshua speaks
of Amorites, what Dillon raised. And we have a choice to which elohiym powers we serve.
Ex 20:3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
The command tells us that other elohiym powers opposing God exists, otherwise this royal torah makes no sense. But Dave ignores this idea. Written before man was created. In fact since Sabbath is here in this law as well,
it was written before Sabbath was created too.
The tree of RA tells you who is other elohiym power is.
There were two trees, thus two opposing elohiym powers established in the garden.
Back to the question on hand
Does God have the right to wound you before you have a chance of choosing to be saved by God? No, that would be killing off any chance of salvation for you.
How much living and chances does a person need before God can take back His living in you, because you refuse to choose His offer of salvation? Well that depends upon the unpardonable nature of the persons rebellion.
Some people reach epigentic stages where no further salvation free will decisions are made even if another 300 years were given to them. They are lost.
The is an interesting Hebrew word to study "aven", it is a DNA gene word translated into English as propensity.
Everything you do is recorded by the DNA, and your pet sins become habits of RA that are inherited by your children. There comes a time after 5 generations when your aven affects completely swamp the children's children, so there is no chance of them making a free will decision without the propensities pulling them into the way of the parents before them.
Example the Amorites
were given 400 years for this.
Now I have tried to answer you question, and as you see its complex and hard to fathom, it is mixed with Gods hard love and soft love, and with mercy and judgement.
Now you try to show me your views from Scripture/
-----------------------
Question Where is the verse for this angel of death?
2Sa 24:16 And when the angel stretched out his hand upon Jerusalem to destroy it, the LORD repented him of the evil,
Not angel here, but messenger, and not a phrase
messenger of death.... you are adding to the text.
--------------------
The destroying wind,
does look and function like an angel though, from my Hebrew English translator
"The angel of mercy was then folding her wings to step down from the golden throne to give place to justice and swift-coming judgment. But Christ's great heart of love still pleaded for Jerusalem, that had scorned His mercies, despised His warnings, and was about to imbrue her hands in His blood. If Jerusalem would but repent, it was not yet too late"Notice "her wings"
When the angel of mercy folds her wings and departs Satan will do the evil deeds he has long wished to do. Storm and tempest, war and bloodshed—in these things he delights, and thus he gathers in his harvestAnd this is found in the torah too, does the medium of the HS destroy or does the HS medium allow another power to destroy?
1Ki 22:23 Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee.
The medium
a function from God, allows Satan to enter the medium and destroy as a lying medium.
Why can't Satan destroy on his own? Because as Dave point out Satan is no creator and has no powers. And the sin problem is all controlled by God to begin with. Does this mean God is a destroyer, after all God is functionally allowing a medium to work for good or evil?
Just as man engineered the gun, for good or evil does not make the engineers guilty of evil when evil people kill with the gun.
A medium does not take active sides in the function, each elohiym power uses the medium for its purposes. That is why 1Kings is written as a lying medium, not identifying the agent who does this specifically. The cherub who sinned answers the blanks, a verse Dave ignores to add to the missing pieces of the story.
Shalom