|
|
Post by Dave on Aug 21, 2016 14:33:23 GMT -5
Soft tissue from dinosaurs means
Dinosaurs are not millions of years old
Evolution is in error
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert T on Sept 11, 2019 13:36:07 GMT -5
Yes evolution is always in error... the fact is when information get copied over and over every second, information gets lost, corrupted and damaged, NEVER do we find information becoming more inspired than the writer who originally wrote the information.
John Sanford is a great genetics science person, to watch on U Tube video. DNA information runs downhill, never uphill.
Marco Polo wrote about dinosaurs in China in his diaries, but man ignores the diaries, but accepts other writings of his. Funny that.
The Inca Stones also depict mankind hunting dinosaurs...
I battled once with a Catholic who saw Evolution as a part of Catholicism (official stance nowadays?). Such a stance destroys Sin and Death, destroys having a Saviour, and destroys the good job of Creation even. We battled for over 10 weeks on line forum, and Barbarian, his forum name, never gave up his stand. And we went very deep, science example after science example, but he never gave me an example of DNA mutations with natural selection becoming a better design of information inherited for the next generation.
Consider bacteria, every 20 minutes is a new generation, single DNA genes, yet no examples of better arrangements of DNA code, only inheriting as Sanford explains "rust", which natural selection can't get rid of fast enough, so the species becomes extinct. If you assume one good DNA inclusion per 100 generations (fantastic odds), the species still becomes extinct after 200 generations, according to his simulated Mendel's Accountant Website.
Evolution is a dead subject, right from the beginning. Archon saw DNA running badly after Adam sinned, and thought how can I turn this into a religion?
Da 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
This "god of forces" or "god of science" arose around after the dark ages, has become a new religion unknown to previous "gods" people had. Thus evolution is a science religion that opposes Creation Science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 12, 2019 15:02:57 GMT -5
Thus evolution is a science religion that opposes Creation Science. Agreed - I have a personal stake in the age of the earth I have a theory in geophysics concerning the Flood My theory - The Fluid Dynamics of Whole earth Decompression Adds to and supplements - J. Marvin Herndon, 2005, Whole Earth Decompression Dynamics Basically - the Earth began as a giant proto-planet much like Jupiter The sun erupted and blew off the gas atmospheres of the inner planets Without the a large canopy of atmosphere around planetoid Pangea the gravity well changed and the Earth was allowed to decompress to to its present diameter Time measurement Carbon dating - the use of cobalt or strontium - the methodology always uses the same assumption. The total today = the total of yesterday therefore the math is linear Total of isotope yesterday (=same as today) - decay = age J. Marvin Herndon's theory and mine both suggest a much larger concentrations of everything at much greater pressures. This skew - causes a telescopic effect on time measurements |
|
|
|
Post by Robert T on Sept 13, 2019 11:59:10 GMT -5
Are yes, the science of assumptions.
Are you familiar with Robert Gantry and his work on halos on granites?
Seems like when Jesus spoke granite into existence, the radiation decay implies the granite crystals were made in less than a few seconds of time.
Many things are full of mysteries..
Shalom my friend
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Sept 14, 2019 13:27:03 GMT -5
My guy - J. Marvin Herndon -- A.K.A = the Maverick Scientist
Quote #1- Paraphrase - Science is taught by consensus. Even in evolution there are 500 theories - 490 of them are dismissed by consensus. This doesn't mean they are wrong - it just means they are not in alignment with the consensus. Long held attitudes are hard to alter and these attitudes dismiss idioms that that don't support the standard model.
Quote #2 - "When your on the right track, the pieces simply fit together."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 3:49:22 GMT -5
Thanks for pointing out a great scientist, marginalized because he dares to speak out...
Yet, a toxic geo-engineering program, the secretive "chemtrails" spraying, has been embarked upon presumably to combat the so-called man-made global warming by putting reflective chemicals into the atmosphere, Herndon continued. Condemning this activity, he said it poisons people with nano-particles of aluminum, barium, and other heavy metals that fall to the Earth, and evidence for this has been uncovered in tested raindrops. Living in San Diego, "you can see the jets spraying the substances out...and eventually with enough spraying, the sky becomes overcast...
Chemical poisons taint our air and our health.
Shalom
|
|
