Jewish Demonology

[Deleted]

D"Did you really watch this video with serious attention?
R" Yes
D"I made all of my comments when I posted the video – DUH
Your pretend ignorance – only harms your credibility
R" What comments?

I suggest you start again affer replying to my comments on the video you replies to

You post too much stuff, I have work to do other than sit here all day reading your stuff.
Been here already 3 hours.

When you post a video, post your discussion with it. And include a single video.

I am lost in all your presentation.
NOW reply to the earlier video I watched and you replied to,

Shalom

[Dave]

D" No where do they make reference to Ezk 28 or Isa 14 – or Fallen Angels
0:39 seconds in "in a state of rebellion" not told why or how...
"on a mission to ruin God's world for other creatures"
"A symbol of evil, that drags the world back into darkness and disorder"
So human rebellion is interwoven with a spiritual rebellion'
"So the snake could be a spiritual being" Gen 3
DUH –
Rev 12:3 Then another sign appeared in heaven: a great fiery red dragon that had seven heads and ten horns, and seven royal crowns on his heads.
Rev 12:4 His tail sweeps away a third of the stars of heaven—it hurled them to the earth. Now the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that whenever she gave birth he might devour her child.

The state of rebellion is the nature of the Beast
Created for a purpose

Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created—in heaven and on earth, the seen and the unseen, whether thrones or angelic powers or rulers or authorities. All was created through Him and for Him.

SO snake is a former staff member is God's throne room
YES – The Beast began in heaven - The First Age

But when .... describes them they are spehium?
The saraph is not a creature,
but the function of a creature... it means to be burning.
Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested – their presentation went into detail why you are incorrect

jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13437-seraphim
SERAPHIM 
Class of heavenly beings, mentioned only once in the Old Testament, in a vision of the prophet Isaiah (vi. 2 et seq.). Isaiah saw several seraphim, their exact number not being given, standing before the throne of Yhwh. They were winged beings, each having six wings—two covering their faces, two covering their feet, and two for flying

Brown-Driver-Briggs'
1) serpent, fiery serpent
1a) poisonous serpent (fiery from burning effect of poison)
2) seraph, seraphim
2a) majestic beings with 6 wings, human hands or voices in attendance upon God

McClintock and Strong Biblical Cyclopedia
Seraphim
Ser'aphim (Heb. Seraphim', שׂרָפַים; Sept. Σεραφίμ, or Seraphs; the plural of the word שָׂרָŠ, saraph), celestial beings described in Isa 6:2-6 as an order of angels or ministers of God, who stand around his throne, having each six wings,

Saraph
The KJV Old Testament Hebrew Lexicon
Strong's Number: 08314 Browse Lexicon
Definition
serpent, fiery serpent
poisonous serpent (fiery from burning effect of poison)
seraph, seraphim
majestic beings with 6 wings, human hands or voices in attendance upon God

Princeton's WordNet(0.00 / 0 votes)Rate this definition:
seraph
an angel of the first order; usually portrayed as the winged head of a child

Wiktionary
Seraph noun
A six-winged angel; the highest choir or order of angels in Christian angelology, ranked above cherubim, and below God. A detailed description can be found at the beginning of Isaiah chapter 6
Etymology: Singular form of seraphim, from seraphim, from שרפים, plural form of שרף.

Webster Dictionary
Seraph noun
one of an order of celestial beings, each having three pairs of wings. In ecclesiastical art and in poetry, a seraph is represented as one of a class of angels
Etymology: [Heb. serphim, pl.]

Chambers 20th Century Dictionary
Seraph
ser′af, n. an angel of the highest rank in the traditional angelology of the church, due to Dionysius the Areopagite, who places the seraphim at the head of the nine choirs of angels, the first rank being formed by the seraphim, cherubim, and throni:—pl. Seraphs (ser′afs), Seraphim (ser′af-im), celestial beings on either side of the throne of Jehovah, seen in prophetic vision by Isaiah, and by him alone (vi. 2-6): a geometrid moth.—adjs. Seraph′ic, -al, pertaining to, or becoming, a seraph: angelic: pure: sublime: refined

Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested – the burring ones comes only from Strong’s concordance - The error of only using one source
Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew

OK summary to negate your statement"
D"D" No where do they make reference to Ezk 28 or Isa 14 – or Fallen Angels
1) "in a state of rebellion"
2) SO snake is a former staff member is God's throne room
3) the snake is a seraphim or cheribum, the Hebrew word for ...?

Rev 12:3 Then another sign appeared in heaven: a great fiery red dragon that had seven heads and ten horns, and seven royal crowns on his heads.
Rev 12:4 His tail sweeps away a third of the stars of heaven—it hurled them to the earth. Now the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that whenever she gave birth he might devour her child.

Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was thrown down—the ancient serpent, called the devil and satan, who deceives the whole world.

Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created—in heaven and on earth, the seen and the unseen, whether thrones or angelic powers or rulers or authorities. All was created through Him and for Him.

Cheribums are angels, and seraphim are angels, former staff member of God, in a state of rebellion, on earth to cause creation to go back to darkness and disorder.
Correct – created for a specific function / purpose

Now I have replied to your statement, the video does not present "fallen angels", well it does, very clearly, maybe not using those exact words. Do you agree with my discussion?
Absolutely Not – the only way your teaching can be correct is if you deny the agl/NT

Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created—in heaven and on earth, the seen and the unseen, whether thrones or angelic powers or rulers or authorities. All was created through Him and for Him.

Rev 4:11 “Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, For You created all things, and because of Your will they existed and were created!”

[Dave]

D"Did you really watch this video with serious attention?
R" Yes
The depth of your review was just a shallow dismissal – not the work of a serious student

D"I made all of my comments when I posted the video – DUH
Your pretend ignorance – only harms your credibility
R" What comments?
Again - Your pretend ignorance – only harms your credibility
You have been on this forum for almost 3 years – your pretend inability to navigate this form is just an excuse from you

You can click on the ‘date stamp’ within the quote
Or you could go to that thread – Jewish Demonology and – boom there it is

I suggest you start again
Suggest away buddy boy

You post too much stuff, I have work to do other than sit here all day reading your stuff.
Been here already 3 hours.
When you post a video, post your discussion with it. And include a single video.

1- I only asked you to watch two videos
2- No one said you had to do it all today – your whining is just an excuse
3- I did post those two videos – one at a time – you just ignored them when I did – you just ignored them when I asked you to watch two of them
4- I posted all my comments in great detail on each video as I posted them

I am lost in all your presentation.
Your pretend ignorance – is just an excuse – to avoid – and evade and direct answer

Why does Jewish Theology scare you so much? It is the very foundation of Christianity – Jesus was a Jew – His disciples were Jews – all the first Christians were Jews – all the first Christians that received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost were Jewish.

Why do you choose church doctrine over the Inspired Word of God?

[Deleted]

D"Why does Jewish Theology scare you so much?
R" It does not scare me, but you have to present one post at a time, one thread at a time and one video at a time, with discussion, and let me reply with my discussion.

No I am not familiar with time date stamp, I click on the NEW posts as they come and they take me to you latest post, but often you make 2 or 3 on the same day, too much additions.

D"Why do you choose church doctrine over the Inspired Word of God?
R" You also have to stop making fun of me and stop making up stuff, I do not support. Just do your discussion in a serious and friendly manner. OK? And I will write and do my discussion.


------------------------------------first video----------------------

RP"Do you agree with my discussion?
D" Absolutely Not – the only way your teaching can be correct is if you deny the agl/NT
R" OK where is your discussion, what don't you agree about?

By the way I have watched this video twice, all the way through...

D"Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested – the burring ones comes only from Strong’s concordance - The error of only using one source
Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew

R" Not part of the discussion to my discussion, you posted the video, not me?
No idea what you are saying....

D"Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested – their presentation went into detail why you are incorrect
R" What on earth is this all about?

You post a whole heap of scholars over the meaning of saraph? I only use Jeff Benner and trust Jeff Benner nearly all the time.

(1) You render the meaning of a word by looking up all the verses that use the word,
in this case both verb and noun forms have to all have a similar meaning.
Your scholars do not do this/
Your scholars assume polysemy. I don't.

If we don't agree how to render word meanings, maybe we could discuss this first? It's no word game either, Jeff Benner is again my influence and why I like him so much, I thought I was the only kooky one out there, but there are two, Jeff and me. Every Hebrew word should have a single basic meaning, regardless of the context. 

The speaker clearly said the cherubims are also seriphims, as snakes. That makes the serpent a seriphim and a cherubim?

Now is this correct or not? I am just quoting what the speaker said.

Now it's your turn to write the discussion, if you agree with me, than this video is not supporting your view. If you don't agree with me, than how can a speaker say something and later mean something else?
Please explain. Or perhaps I didn't hear it properly, I am told to do have poor listening skills.

SHalom

[Dave]

D"Why does Jewish Theology scare you so much?
R" It does not scare me, but you have to present one post at a time, one thread at a time and one video at a time, with discussion, and let me reply with my discussion.

I have – you refuse to participate
For some reason you refuse to acknowledge Jewish Theology
You demand that the Jews do not know their own language, religion, or theology

D"Why do you choose church doctrine over the Inspired Word of God?
R" You also have to stop making fun of me and stop making up stuff,

Col 1:16 For by Him all things were created—in heaven and on earth, the seen and the unseen, whether thrones or angelic powers or rulers or authorities. All was created through Him and for Him.

Paul says – the Beast of Revelation – that old serpent – was made by God for God
You teach that your satan recreated himself against God’s Will then change God’s Plan
I am not making up scripture – you are just denying it so that your church doctrine can fit

------------------------------------first video----------------------

RP"Do you agree with my discussion?
D" Absolutely Not – the only way your teaching can be correct is if you deny the agl/NT
R" OK where is your discussion, what don't you agree about?

Paul says – the Beast of Revelation – that old serpent – was made by God for God
You teach that your satan recreated himself against God’s Will then change God’s Plan
I am not making up scripture – you are just denying it so that your church doctrine can fit

By the way I have watched this video twice, all the way through...
D"Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested – the burring ones comes only from Strong’s concordance - The error of only using one source
Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew
R" Not part of the discussion to my discussion, you posted the video, not me?
No idea what you are saying....

May 1, 2022 13:11:13 GMT -5 Dave said:

Favor – stop and discuss this – there are things in here you will say support you
I will say it all supports me

May 1, 2022 13:00:13 GMT -5 Dave said:

The Satan and Demons Question and Response – BibleProject 46:47 min

WOW – what an intelligent discussion!
This presentation is very Jewish and very Gnostic and 100% Christian

This video – is the Q&A of their video I posted to Jewish Demonology

MY comments on that video =

5:40 – the Seraphim are SNAKES – serpents = serpent race
vrs – the burning ones
Confusion about the Hebrew language
8:16 – a Seraphim with wings – a flying snake
8:45 – very Jeff Brenner – 3 letter root Hebrew stems

10:12 – The Error of Strongs Numbers = the author’s theology impact upon his definitions

Flying snakes – heavily host – around the thrones of ‘other gods’

Repeat - Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew

I only use Jeff Benner and trust Jeff Benner nearly all the time.
LIE – do you trust his version of Gen 3? - NO

(1) You render the meaning of a word by looking up all the verses that use the word,
If we don't agree how to render word meanings, maybe we could discuss this first? It's no word game

Your Robert method had failed you repeatedly here!
You pluck word out of context and violate grammar
Playing word games without bothering to learn to translate is just a short cut to error
As you have proven here in spades

[Deleted]

D"5:40 – the Seraphim are SNAKES – serpents = serpent race
vrs – the burning ones
Confusion about the Hebrew language
8:16 – a Seraphim with wings – a flying snake
8:45 – very Jeff Brenner – 3 letter root Hebrew stems

10:12 – The Error of Strongs Numbers = the author’s theology impact upon his definitions

Flying snakes – heavily host – around the thrones of ‘other gods’

Dave you are throwing your spin over what you want the speaker to say.
Please quote the exact words of the speaker.
I do not agree the speaker is agreeing with your view at all.

I watched the video a third time all the way through.

About 2 minutes in he says

In fact around 1:58

About 1:58 minutes in he says

"Eden is a high place
Snake a spiritual being'
Prophet Ezekiel understood the creature as one who didn't want to live under Ghod's wisdom and authority'
He wanted to be God
That's the same temptation the snake put before Adam and Eve".

Now I am quoting the exact words of the speaker, and I am sorry to say you goofed.
He is not supporting your view.
Maybe he does a little later on.
A video that presents 90% of your view, is not presenting your view.

Now do you agree the speaker is speaking of a fallen angel who wanted to take over God's job of being God? DO you agree with this ?

The rest of the video is whatever....

I discovered your other videos, with discussion and will get through them, after you agree this video is at best only partially supporting your view?

SHalom

[Dave]

Dave you are throwing your spin over what you want the speaker to say.
Please quote the exact words of the speaker.
I do not agree the speaker is agreeing with your view at all.

I watched the video a third time all the way through.
In fact around 1:58 - "Eden is a high place - Snake a spiritual being'
Prophet Ezekiel understood the creature as one who didn't want to live under Ghod's wisdom and authority'

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?
At 1:58 – 2:08 - he says “… in the Bible. Another possibility is that Genesis 3 is telling you the rebellion story of the snake and the human simultaneously”

You are just jerking me around - game player - play elsewhere - you just wasting time

PS - You asked where are my comments?

I quoted

MY comments on that video =

5:40 – the Seraphim are SNAKES – serpents = serpent race
vrs – the burning ones
Confusion about the Hebrew language
8:16 – a Seraphim with wings – a flying snake
8:45 – very Jeff Brenner – 3 letter root Hebrew stems

10:12 – The Error of Strongs Numbers = the author’s theology impact upon his definitions
Flying snakes – heavily host – around the thrones of ‘other gods’

Repeat - Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew

The video you chose to watch instead is only 6:19 min long

Repeat - Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew

You are just jerking me around

[Dillon]

You sure believe in your satan god – all you do is defend is right to have authority
Fallen Angels is not Jewish theology – does not matter how much you deny it
Fallen Angels is not Jewish theology – it is a Catholic invention

Repeat - Too bad you didn’t watch the video I suggested - we could have discussed the Hebrew
You are just jerking me around
-----------

You cannot teach someone something they do not want to know.

[Dave]

My father was a Chicago White Sox fan – he knew more about that team than he did about his own family. He could quote you stats and players until you were bored to death

My Nephews in Indiana were WWF Wrestling fans back in the day – don’t even bother visiting when its on – they can’t even hear you speak – their attention is focused elsewhere

Today – one of my nephews married and football fan – they know all the players and their histories – they travel for games – they tape the game they cannot see – so they can watch them over and over

Newton – was so fascinated about nature – he wanted to know everything about it – he invented his own math (we call it calculus)

How does anyone become expert in their field – they want to know everything there is to know about it

There is no such thing as a Seminary for Rabbis – they are just men that want to know everything about the Tanak. They sit and are questioned – how well do they know the Tanak. Name a bizar unknown verse – and they better know it – how it applies – what its bigger meaning might e – how does it fit the whole.

Christians skip so much of the ahl/OT – don’t even bother with it
Chuck Missler’s lesson on Numbers 2 – is such an eye opening revelation
Chuck Missler has said – if you understand – every verse is all about the savior – meaning upon meaning and always pointing to Christ

I have been through the ThD process – must be prepared to answer all the questions – and demonstrate how it all supports your thesis

As a Christian – I want to know everything about Christianity – the history – the prophesy – how others see it – how others attack it – what the founding fathers said – what arguments did the founding father have to face – what is the difference between little known Coptic Church and worldwide Roman Christendom.

So it makes you wonder – just why Robert refuses to be and educated person on the topic of Christianity

[Deleted]

I feel sorry for you, you should know better

I now supply the study notes behind the video directly from the BibleProject people.

You goofed and you owe me an apology.

I quote (page 46)

Also important is the prophet Ezekiel, who looks out at Tyre (a powerful seaside kingdom of his day) and accuses its leader of acting like an
ancient spiritual rebel. Ezekiel first accuses Tyre’s king of claiming to
be a deity.

j. Ezekiel then likens the king of Tyre to an ancient spiritual rebel who
inhabited Eden

Isaiah and Ezekiel provides us with the earliest interpretation of the Genesis
3 snake within the Bible itself. These authors understood the snake to be
a spiritual being, one of the winged throne guardians, a “living creature”
(a.k.a. cherubim) in the garden-temple. But as we learned from the “last
will be first” design pattern in Genesis, it seems that we’re meant to infer
that this snake resented coming under the authority of the human creatures
whose origins were in the dirt. And so this glorious creature misused its
honored place of God-given authority and rebelled by seducing the humans
into misusing their authority in the same way. In this way, the snake represents a spiritual rebellion that coincides with the earthly rebellion of the
humans. Genesis 3 portrays the fall of humanity and the fall of the spiritual
rebel


Read the whole study notes yourself

d1bsmz3sdihplr.cloudfront.net/media/Study%20Notes/SBS_00_Series_VN_final_updated.pdf

But I warn you, I do NOT support all the ideas of the Bible Project team.

And I would not use this video to support your views on the archon either.

SHalom

[Dave]

I now supply the study notes behind the video directly from the BibleProject people.
You goofed and you owe me an apology.
I quote (page 46)

I asked you to review 2 videos
You keep talking about another
I ask A – you keep repeating B

I quote (page 46) – the study notes are only 17 pages long


j. Ezekiel then likens the king of Tyre to an ancient spiritual rebel who
inhabited Eden
Man inhabited the Garden – and man fell

it seems that we’re meant to infer that this snake resented coming under the authority of the human creatures whose origins were in the dirt.
Do you know where this comes from? – it is 100% Islamic Koran

Read the whole study notes yourself
I would rather discuss the 2 videos I asked you to review
You keep talking about another
I ask A – you keep repeating B

Next time you ask watch something I'll just pick a different video

[Deleted]

D" the study notes are only 17 pages long
R" You goofed again Dave, the study notes are 79 pages long.

Try clicking on the link


d1bsmz3sdihplr.cloudfront.net/media/Study%20Notes/SBS_00_Series_VN_final_updated.pdf

A PDF format comes up and the page 46 of 79 comes up. On left.

Not a single comment about my discussion.

DO you agree with my discussion?

You goofed?

You said the speaker does not speak of unfallen angels, or Ezekiel 28

On page 46 I quote his notes behind the video.

Do you agree the video speaks of a fallen cherubim , come seraphim / come  flying snake.

This video does not therefore support your view of the archons. Maybe a little later on,
but my point is you choose videos that loosely agree with you, and they do not.
Your Gnostic views are so rare, there are no videos that agree with you or support your view.

Maybe in a few years time others might make videos to help you out. In the mean time you goofed once again. I suggest you ask your church you support to make videos about archons. This church does support archons don't they?

Now before I select another video, are you sure they support your view fully?

Shalom

[Deleted]

I watched the first of your videos on Solomon

First 20 seconds what the???
I quote"

It is often said that many texts were not included
as the bible was translated from
its original language to a common language,
or were intentionally removed
in the course of the numerous translations over the centuries
and years.

One of these texts is the Testament of Solomon, which tells of Solomon, son of David who was king in Jerusalem, and master all spirits of the air, one the earth and under the earth. By the help of these spirits he built the magnificient temple and

its transcendent works.

..these spirits wield against men, and by what angels they are made powerless.

Let us begin.

A demon called Ornias came among them towards sunset and he took half of the pay
of the
2:45 And it came to pass that grace was given to him from the Lord God,
by Michael his archangel

R" "\It is often said that many texts were not included as the bible was translated from
its original language to a common language, or were intentionally removed
in the course of the numerous translations over the centuries and years.

I thought the Hebrew scrolls we have were selected by Jews to be canonized? Please discuss.

Why was this material left out of the Holy Bible?

This video is highly controversial, and does seem to support your view.

One question for now
SHalom

[Dave]

D" the study notes are only 17 pages long
R" You goofed again Dave, the study notes are 79 pages long.
Try clicking on the link
d1bsmz3sdihplr.cloudfront.net/media/Study%20Notes/SBS_00_Series_VN_final_updated.pdf
A PDF format comes up and the page 46 of 79 comes up. On left.

OK – I clicked on your link of proof

May 12, 2022 0:56:37 GMT -5 Dave said:

I now supply the study notes behind the video directly from the BibleProject people.
You goofed and you owe me an apology.
I quote (page 46)

I asked you to review 2 videos
You keep talking about another
I ask A – you keep repeating B

I quote (page 46) – the study notes are only 17 pages long

May 1, 2022 13:11:13 GMT -5 Dave said:

Favor – stop and discuss this – there are things in here you will say support you
I will say it all supports me

May 1, 2022 13:00:13 GMT -5 Dave said:

The Satan and Demons Question and Response – BibleProject 46:47 min

WOW – what an intelligent discussion!
This presentation is very Jewish and very Gnostic and 100% Christian

You goofed and you owe me an apology.

Absolute jerking me around – Absolute nonsense – Absolute waste of time
No matter what I ask you to discuss - you just present your Catholic satan

[Dave]

I watched the first of your videos on Solomon
FINALY – you participate

First 20 seconds what the???
R" "\It is often said that many texts were not included as the bible was translated from
its original language to a common language, or were intentionally removed
in the course of the numerous translations over the centuries and years.

I thought the Hebrew scrolls we have were selected by Jews to be canonized? Please discuss.
What you think – is not taught in any school anywhere

The Jews NEVER HAD A CANON – ‘canon’ = a Roman Catholic stamp of approval

The Jews had Temple Scrolls in a LIBRARY

(google) Showing results for what was in the hebrew temple library
In the library scientific and literary documents were studied and stored. Archival documents were preserved and even dedicated to the gods in the libraries. The temple libraries were the centers where the kings submitted their highest civil achievements for preservation.

Archival documents were preserved
IT WAS A LIBRARY of the wisdom of their forefathers

and even dedicated to the gods
Clarification – ‘God – and ‘other gods’ as in KING SOLOMON

The temple libraries were the centers where the kings submitted their highest civil achievements for preservation.

www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/stewart_don/faq/right-books-in-old-testament/question11-non-canonical-books-old-testament.cfm
WHAT WERE THE NON-CANONICAL BOOKS THAT WERE MENTIONED IN THE OLD TESTAMENT?
Are the Correct Books in the Old Testament? – Question 11

During the Old Testament period, a number of books were composed. In fact, the writer of Ecclesiastes made the following admission about the making of books:

Of anything beyond these, my child, beware. Of making many books there is no end, and much study is a weariness of the flesh. (Ecclesiastes 12:12 NRSV)
Therefore, it seems that there was much literary activity occurring in the ancient world.

The Old Testament mentions the existence of a number of books that have not been placed in Holy Scripture. These include the following:

1. The Book of the Wars of the Lord
In the Book of Numbers there is a quotation from the “Book of the Wars of the Lord.” It says the following:

Wherefore it is said in the Book of the Wars of the LORD. (Numbers 21:14-15 NRSV)
The author, as well as the exact contents of this book is unknown.
Dead Sea Scrolls – War Scroll

2. The Book of Jasher (the Upright One)
3. Solomon’s Proverbs and Songs
Scripture speaks of the number of proverbs and songs of Solomon. We read about this in the Book of 1 Kings. It says:
He spoke three thousand proverbs and his songs numbered a thousand and five. He described plant life, from the cedar of Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of walls. He also taught about animals and birds, reptiles and fish. (1 Kings 4:32-33 NIV)
The (CANONIZED) Book of Proverbs does not contain three thousand proverbs. The Song of Solomon is the only part of Scripture that contains a song from Solomon. For some reason, many of the proverbs and the songs of Solomon were not placed in Holy Scripture.

4. The Acts of Solomon
There is reference to a book called, “The Acts of Solomon,” or the “Annals of Solomon.” We read about this work in First Kings:

As for the other events of Solomon’s reign - all he did and the wisdom he displayed - are they not written in the book of the annals of Solomon? (1 Kings 11:41 NIV)
AS IN THE TESTEMENT OF SOLOMON

5. The Annals of the Kings of Israel
The writer of First Kings mentions a source known as, “The Annals of the Kings of Israel.” It says the following:

The other events of Jeroboam’s reign, his wars and how he ruled, are written in the book of the annals of the kings of Israel. (1 Kings 14:19 NIV)
This would not be the same as the canonical book of First Kings. The author and contents of this particular work are unknown.

6. The Annals of the Kings of Judah
7. The Records of Samuel, Nathan, and Gad

8. The Records of Shemaiah the Prophet and Iddo the Seer
9. The Annals of Jehu
10. The Acts of Uzziah
The prophet Isaiah recorded the acts of King Uzziah. The Chronicler wrote the following:
11. The Laments of Jeremiah

Etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc

The Jews NEVER HAD A CANON – ‘canon’ = a Roman Catholic stamp of approval
The Jews had Temple Scrolls in a LIBRARY

The Torah is a Library of 5 different books (that are the most weighted – respected – valued)
The Nevi'im (Prophets), is a collection of different books – (that are highly weighed – valued – respected)
The Ketuvim (Writings) is a collection of writings – (less weighed books)

WEIGHT
If God siad it - absolute Gold
If a major Prophet said it = Goldish
If a minor prophet said it = Polished Silver

Other text - Bronze - relevant / valuable - just not GOLD

(google) The Old Testament contains 39 (Protestant), 46 (Catholic), or more (Orthodox and other) books,

The Jews NEVER HAD A CANON – ‘canon’ = a Roman Catholic stamp of approval
The Jews had Temple Scrolls in a LIBRARY

Why was this material left out of the Holy Bible?
THE JEWS DID NOT LEAVE ANYTHING OUT – THEY KEPT THEM IN THE TEMPLE LIBRARY
And all of the ‘wisdom’ of their forefathers influenced their theology

IT IS A FACT – IT IS NOT A MYSTERY or a conspiracy – IT IS JEWISH THEOLOGY

FACT – when Ptolemy commissioned the Septuagint (LXX) - it was only the Torah!
It took 500-700 more years for the rest of the Catholic OT make is way into the Septuagint
We have no idea who translated them – or when

This video is highly controversial,
NOT controversial at all – simply Jewish Theology 101
AND it was common knowledge to everyone during the time of Jesus Christ

Jesus quotes from King Solomon – Beelzebub
Everyone understood who he was talking about because it is Jewish theology

and does seem to support your view.
It is absolutely my view – Solomon calls them shedim
First century Greek calls them archon – both within Roman canon – and outside of Roman canon

Apr 12, 2022 13:51:15 GMT -5 Dave said:

What a great place to start - the rise and fall of King Solomon

06:51 – the fall of King Solomon
King Solomon + Greek god Eros + Jewish shedim (Jewish demons) Archon

1Ki 11

07:45 – he make the point – King Solomon’s ideas come from Greek Mythology
TRUTH both date to 900 BC – both appeared at the same time

In 1830 the same Advent math appears for Miller and the Bahai Islamic movement
Robert would never agree his Advent math came for the Reformed Muslims of India
They just appeared at the same time

07:55 - Solomon calls the Greek god Eros – crafty - H6175: - crafty, prudent, subtil.
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.

08:20 – SEX in exchange for worship – some confusion – is Eros the woman or just using the woman

The Gospel of Philip - NLH
The forms of evil spirit include male ones and female ones. The males are they which unite with the souls which inhabit a female form, but the females are they which are mingled with those in a male form, though one who was disobedient. And none shall be able to escape them, since they detain him if he does not receive a male power or a female power, the bridegroom and the bride. One receives them from the mirrored bridal chamber. When the wanton women see a male sitting alone, they leap down on him and play with him and defile him. So also the lecherous men, when they see a beautiful woman sitting alone, they persuade her and compel her, wishing to defile her. But if they see the man and his wife sitting beside one another, the female cannot come into the man, nor can the male come into the woman. So if the image and the angel are united with one another, neither can any venture to go into the man or the woman.

The Gospel of Philip – NHL – 100% Jewish theology

10:10 – Solomon begins his worship to other gods – because of a woman

God leaves Solomon immediately

P.S. - 07:45 – he make the point – King Solomon’s ideas come from Greek Mythology
Solomon worshipped = Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.

Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.

100% agl/OT scripture

P.S.#2- not one mention of Hebrew satan - Ezk 28 - or Isa 14
Just ACHON / shedim - and 'other gods'

This video is highly controversial, and does seem to support your view.
NOT controversial at all – simply Jewish Theology 101
AND it was common knowledge to everyone during the time of Jesus Christ

It is absolutely my view – Solomon calls them shedim
First century Greek calls them archon – both within Roman canon – and outside of Roman canon

May 1, 2022 8:37:38 GMT -5 Dave said:

They say – The Serpent = a Seraphim in the state of rebellion
They say - demons = the bane elohiym – who are also in a state of rebellion

Gnostic – the First Archon – is an Arch-Angel – Archon-Angel = the Serpent
Gnostic – this is a race of beings – the serpent race - bane elohiym
Gnostic – God created them by the Left Hand for a purpose
Gnostic – God placed an overseer to limit the chaos

Jewish – Belzebul is the chief demon on earth
Jewish – Belzebul is the offspring of an Arch-Angel
Jewish – Bezebul father the demons / shedim
Jewish – some of the shedim admit they were Nephilim
Jewish – Belzebul needs permission from the angel Uriel to appear
Jewish – God made them because God made everything

NOT controversial at all – simply Jewish Theology 101
AND it was common knowledge to everyone during the time of Jesus Christ

It is absolutely my view

BECAUSE – it was the theology at the time of Jesus Christ

BEFORE ROME TAUGHT YOU OTHERWISE – before Rome rewrote history for you – before Rome changed it to their own Old Testament version that is a completely different religion center around Fallen Angels that change all God’s Plan against God’s Will

I watched the first of your videos on Solomon
FINALY – you participate

Apr 12, 2022 20:58:22 GMT -5 Dave said:

youtu.be/P6eoeIrvYbE
Solomon & The Demons Onoskelis & Beelzebub: Testament of Solomon (Part 2): Demonology
4:59 min

0:15 – Belzebul = King of the Demons
0:55 – Solomon calls the King of the demons – the Prince of the Demons
1:00 – Belzebul calls himself the RULER of the demons

1:40 – Onoskelis – a female demon - The Succubus
She is a chimera – part beautiful woman + the legs of an ass

2:20 – she perverts men from their true natures
2:30 – she creeps up from nature = WORLD
2:40 – she consort with men as a woman
2:50 – those who worship her star = only harm themselves
3:00 – some people worship her star to make money
3:15 – born of a voice – spoke into existence

3:30 – what is her star = the Moon
3:45 – what angel frustrates her – the spirit that lives within Solomon (you)
THE SPIRIT OF GOD WITHIN SOLOMON

4:12 – she is commanded to spin the hemp rope used for the Temple construction – night and day
(Marijuana in the ahl)

Secular –
1- Rumpelstiltskin – the maiden who spun her hair into gold – night and day
2- Greek goddess Echo = (wiki) Echo, in Greek mythology, a mountain nymph, or oread.

3- Hebrew Bath Kol = www.myjewishlearning.com/article/bat-kol-a-divine-voice/
bat kol, literally “daughter of a voice,” refers to a heavenly voice that proclaims God’s will or a divine judgment in a matter of legal dispute
Question for Robert – you teach Hebrew word have polar opposites
Is there an argument in your view – that a oice for God – is also a voice opposing God?
---------------------

youtu.be/W94rEW-TPgU
Solomon & The Demon Amosdeus: Testament of Solomon (Part 3): Demonology
5:35 min

1:00 - The Demon Amosdeus admits that he is a Nephilim – angel seed + mortal woman
1:20 – men call his star the Dragon’s Child
1:45 – he wasn’t to be revered as a god – ‘other god’

1:55 – mission to keep man from knowing the angels above them – above our kind – above the archon
Gnostic – the mission of the Archon = keep man preoccupied so he has no time for the Holy Spirit

2:13 – the business of Amosdeus = to cause marital strife
2:34 – he tempts men into fits of desire – women / lust / greed
4:25 – the demon is ordered to help build the Temple of God
-------------

youtu.be/ZnX8mNiCl44
Solomon Binds Beelzebub (Satan) - The Prince of Demons: Testament of Solomon (Part 4): Demonology
5:13 min

0:35 – Belzebul says – he is all that is left of those that came down
HE WAS AN ANGEL IN HEAVE AND NOW IN COTROL OF EARTH
1- Robert and I have agreed in the past – English angel = messenger
There are messengers from the Lord = angels
There are messengers from John = just messengers
There are messengers of the Beast = archon
DEFINITION OF TERMS

2- if Ezk 28 was valid as Robert teaches – this could be his guy
However Roberts teaching requires his guy to change God’s Plan against God’s Will and – switch sides – become the oppose

3- Gnostic = this could be the Beast himself – or just the General of the Beast in charge of earth
4 – Gnostic – Belzebul has an angel that oversee him – remember Ureil of Part #1
The angel Ureil had to grant permission

5- The angel / messenger that came down = Gen 6 bane elohiym

Gnostic
The Gospel of the Egyptians - NHL
After five thousand years, the great light Eleleth spoke: "Let someone reign over the chaos and Hades." And there appeared a cloud whose name is hylic Sophia [...] She looked out on the parts of the chaos, her face being like [...] in her form [...] blood. And the great angel Gamaliel spoke to the great Gabriel, the minister of the great light Oroiael; he said, "Let an angel come forth, in order that he may reign over the chaos and Hades." Then the cloud, being agreeable, came forth in the two monads, each one of which had light. [...] the throne, which she had placed in the cloud above.

the throne, which she had placed in the cloud above. =

The Apocryphon of John -NHL
She wanted to bring forth a likeness out of herself without the consent of the Spirit, - he had not approved - and without her consort, and without his consideration. And though the person of her maleness had not approved, and she had not found her agreement, and she had thought without the consent of the Spirit and the knowledge of her agreement, (yet) she brought forth. And because of the invincible power which is in her, her thought did not remain idle, and something came out of her which was imperfect and different from her appearance, because she had created it without her consort. And it was dissimilar to the likeness of its mother, for it has another form.

"And when she saw (the consequences of) her desire, it changed into a form of a lion-faced serpent. And its eyes were like lightning fires which flash. She cast it away from her, outside that place, that no one of the immortal ones might see it, for she had created it in ignorance. And she surrounded it with a luminous cloud, and she placed a throne in the middle of the cloud that no one might see it except the holy Spirit who is called the mother of the living. And she called his name Yaltabaoth.

without her consort, and without his consideration =

Mat 6:3 But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:

The Jewish concept of Hands = the Jewish concept of duality
Right Hand = instruction / salvation / male / tov
Left Hand = the hand of Mystery / judgment / trouble / female / ra

POINT – Gnostic Christianity – is 100% Jewish duality + God incarnate (Jesus Christ) = Trinity

0:50 – Belzebul has a child that haunts the Red Sea
1:05 – the duties of Belzebul – he destroys kings
1:10 – he allies himself with Tyrants (shadow government)
1:13 - he sends his demons / shedim
SO MEN ARE LOST
1:20 – he arouses within men – DESIRE (yester ra) for wicked sins / lawless deeds / evil heresies
1:35 – I fill men with wroth and the desire for murder

2:40 – Belzebul’s star = Venus – the morning star
(OOH fuel for Robert’s Isa 14)
2:50 – what angel frustrates him – THE NAME OF THE LORD
2:55 – invoke the name of God and Belzubul must leave you immediately
3:00 – Belzebul is put to work – helping to build the temple

4:08 – Belzubul = Jewish satan = Canaanite ‘other god’ Baal

4:17 – Jewish satan and Lucifer are not the same – or are they
4:30 – Jewish satan = the Canaanite Lord of the Flies and the dung

Gnostic – No reference to Lucifer

P.S. - ZERO REFERENCE TO EZK 28 - or self determination by Jewish satan