Post by Richard on Jan 1, 2013 15:40:07 GMT -5
Why physicists can't avoid a creation event
New Scientist, Magazine issue 2847, 11 January 2012, Lisa Grossman
www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328474.400-why-physicists-cant-avoid-a-creation-event.html
Editorial: "The Genesis problem"
YOU could call them the worst birthday presents ever. At the meeting of minds convened last week to honour Stephen Hawking's 70th birthday - loftily titled "State of the Universe" - two bold proposals posed serious threats to our existing understanding of the cosmos.
One shows that a problematic object called a naked singularity is a lot more likely to exist than previously assumed (see "Naked black-hole hearts live in the fifth dimension"). The other suggests that the universe is not eternal, resurrecting the thorny question of how to kick-start the cosmos without the hand of a supernatural creator.
I believe in the 'Big Bang' theory. God spoke and Bang -it was!
New Scientist, Magazine issue 2847, 11 January 2012, Lisa Grossman
www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328474.400-why-physicists-cant-avoid-a-creation-event.html
Editorial: "The Genesis problem"
YOU could call them the worst birthday presents ever. At the meeting of minds convened last week to honour Stephen Hawking's 70th birthday - loftily titled "State of the Universe" - two bold proposals posed serious threats to our existing understanding of the cosmos.
One shows that a problematic object called a naked singularity is a lot more likely to exist than previously assumed (see "Naked black-hole hearts live in the fifth dimension"). The other suggests that the universe is not eternal, resurrecting the thorny question of how to kick-start the cosmos without the hand of a supernatural creator.
I believe in the 'Big Bang' theory. God spoke and Bang -it was!
Attachments:
