Post by Dave on Nov 14, 2013 17:13:47 GMT -5
This was posted to my FB page to consider:
dai.ly/xv6tdf
www.dailymotion.com/video/xv6tdf_what-happened-before-the-beginning-2010_shortfilms#.UoUcuUIDfkk.facebook
My response:
Absolute agreement – Singularity – one single dot containing all the energy that would ever be in the universe –complete agreement with scripture and currently measurable cosmology.
However, I am going to point out that science is only concerned with the measurable and fails to include the non-measurable – things like the galactic consciousness – paranormal events – Nostradamus and Edgar Casey – ancients scriptures ability to nail current scientific theory as to non-linear time and 10 dimensions of space, which places our 3D corporeal reality within a Trinity. Include this data set and restated as a single point containing all data, all knowledge = then the singularity is both omnipotent and omiscience.
Act one- the singularity pops in existence from nowhere and no-when – opps! Nice addition to measurable science to complete the cosmology.
Act two – expansion – complete agreement with multidimesionnal theory and sacred geometry. The second dimension – omnipresent – the womb of creation as stated by the sacred geometry people - The Vesica Piscis
Act three – matter – 3 dimensional reality – and the expression of omnipotence
Complete agreement with Gnostic literature, sacred geometry, and John 1:1-14
Dr Martin Bojowald
Quantized time - Discreet increments of time- space time atoms – pure speculation, not a measurable event, inconsistent with scripture and Einstein that time is not linear. But his idea that the first second of our universe is just the last second of a previous universe - not consistent with Romanism - but completely consistent with Messianic Judaism according to the Zohar which goes one further and discusses many earths that were created and destroyed before this one.
One universe collapsing into the new universe over and over without beginning – an endless cycle - an eternal line of never ending progression and the strict definition of the first dimensional singularity infinite in past and future time.
String Theory
The math supports 10D, or 11D,or multiples of 11Ds – I stop at 10 and so do String Theorist. I stop there because 10 heavens is consistent with Enoch, Apostle Paul, the Jewish Zohar, and Jewish commentary on the OT - God has 10 names, heaven has 10 names. If you make the assumption that we live in a 3D reality then 10D is also consistent with Islam and Hindi.
The Jewish Zohar talks a lot about 10 heavenly realms and again about 10 celestial realms.
From the Jewish Kabbalah, “THE BOOK OF CREATION 1:2. “Ten are the numbers, as are the Sephiroth, (the 10 attributes/emanations in Kabbalah through which God created the world and/or manifests Himself) and twenty-two the letters, these are the Foundation of all things. Of these letters, three are mothers, seven are double, and twelve are simple. 3. The ten numbers formed from nothing are the Decad: these are seen in the fingers of the hands, five on one, five on the other, and over them is the Covenant by voice spiritual, and the rite of Circumcision, corporeal (as of Abraham). 4. Ten are the numbers of the ineffable Sephiroth, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven. Learn this wisdom, and be wise in the understanding of it, investigate these numbers, and draw knowledge from them, fix the design in its purity, and pass from it to its Creator seated on his throne. 5. These Ten Numbers, beyond the Infinite one, have the boundless realms, boundless origin and end, an abyss of good and one of evil, boundless height and depth, East and West, North and South, and the one only God and king, faithful forever seated on his throne, shall rule over all, forever and ever. 6. These ten Sephiroth which are ineffable, whose appearance is like scintillating flames, have no end but are infinite. The word of God is in them as they burst forth, and as they return; they obey the divine command, rushing along as a whirlwind, returning to prostrate themselves at his throne….”
M-Theory
The biggest academic obstacle of string theory’s 10-dimensions of space and one dimension of time is the fringe group of scientist that endorse a 11-dimensional theory, which they believe unites all the variations of string theory into one theory that would supersede them all.
M Theory speculates that this eleventh dimension is an infinitely long string, infinitely narrow, yet contains all the other dimensions within. For me, this just sounds like a simple restatement of the strictest definition of that first dimensional singularity: A body in the first dimension may be represented by a straight line. One may imagine that a point when engulfs infinite number of other points in a particular direction, it forms a straight line, a straight line that has no area or volume. Hence like a point, it also cannot be drawn, but only located, and it also has no mass as it occupies no volume."
Search for an image of M Theory’s infinitely long and infinitely narrow string and you get a ball looking object. An infinitely long string wrapped up upon itself like some form of Mobius Loop. Yet if the sting is infinitely narrow, then this ball looking object would be infinitely small – or a single point - the singularly that I maintain is at the very foundation of all dimensions.
When Edward Witten coined the name, M-theory, in 1995, he did not specify what the M stood for; perhaps because this newest theory was not yet fully defined. Originally the letter M in M-theory was taken from membrane, a construct designed to generalize the strings of string theory. However, as Witten was more skeptical about membranes than his colleagues, he opted for "M-theory" rather than "Membrane theory." Witten has since stated that the different interpretations of the M can be a matter of taste for the user, such as matrix, magic, mystery, and mother theory.
The major criticisms by M-theory’s opponents assert: M-theory is not provable. Therefore, many in the scientific community do not consider it a valid theory of science. M-theory does not explain the origin of the energy needed to create a membrane universe. In summary, opponents assert M-Theorist are trying to explain a universe we can experience and measure with an M-theory universe that we cannot experience and measure. However, those of us that have a faith based belief understand fully what the mysterious magic of the matrix truly represents – God the Father – the singularity - and that really is the mother theory of all creation. Isn’t it?
I am so fascinated with science’s inability to acknowledge the first dimensional singularity. In fact, in all of the discussion about multiple dimensions have led some to conclude that there must be an 11th dimension which looks like, acts like, and seems like just a restatement of the first dimension. What was the oppositions criticism of the M-Theorist trying to explain a universe we can experience and measure with (a first dimensional point that contains all points, an absolute omniscience singularity) which science cannot experience or measure. Do these scientists even listen to themselves? Any discussion of a multiple anything, especially multiple dimensions, must begin with the first one, the corner stone, or the building block of them all. How can you discuss the amazing boundaries of multiple dimensions, and yet, ignore the first dimension as if it doesn’t exist?
dai.ly/xv6tdf
www.dailymotion.com/video/xv6tdf_what-happened-before-the-beginning-2010_shortfilms#.UoUcuUIDfkk.facebook
My response:
Absolute agreement – Singularity – one single dot containing all the energy that would ever be in the universe –complete agreement with scripture and currently measurable cosmology.
However, I am going to point out that science is only concerned with the measurable and fails to include the non-measurable – things like the galactic consciousness – paranormal events – Nostradamus and Edgar Casey – ancients scriptures ability to nail current scientific theory as to non-linear time and 10 dimensions of space, which places our 3D corporeal reality within a Trinity. Include this data set and restated as a single point containing all data, all knowledge = then the singularity is both omnipotent and omiscience.
Act one- the singularity pops in existence from nowhere and no-when – opps! Nice addition to measurable science to complete the cosmology.
Act two – expansion – complete agreement with multidimesionnal theory and sacred geometry. The second dimension – omnipresent – the womb of creation as stated by the sacred geometry people - The Vesica Piscis
Act three – matter – 3 dimensional reality – and the expression of omnipotence
Complete agreement with Gnostic literature, sacred geometry, and John 1:1-14
Dr Martin Bojowald
Quantized time - Discreet increments of time- space time atoms – pure speculation, not a measurable event, inconsistent with scripture and Einstein that time is not linear. But his idea that the first second of our universe is just the last second of a previous universe - not consistent with Romanism - but completely consistent with Messianic Judaism according to the Zohar which goes one further and discusses many earths that were created and destroyed before this one.
One universe collapsing into the new universe over and over without beginning – an endless cycle - an eternal line of never ending progression and the strict definition of the first dimensional singularity infinite in past and future time.
String Theory
The math supports 10D, or 11D,or multiples of 11Ds – I stop at 10 and so do String Theorist. I stop there because 10 heavens is consistent with Enoch, Apostle Paul, the Jewish Zohar, and Jewish commentary on the OT - God has 10 names, heaven has 10 names. If you make the assumption that we live in a 3D reality then 10D is also consistent with Islam and Hindi.
The Jewish Zohar talks a lot about 10 heavenly realms and again about 10 celestial realms.
From the Jewish Kabbalah, “THE BOOK OF CREATION 1:2. “Ten are the numbers, as are the Sephiroth, (the 10 attributes/emanations in Kabbalah through which God created the world and/or manifests Himself) and twenty-two the letters, these are the Foundation of all things. Of these letters, three are mothers, seven are double, and twelve are simple. 3. The ten numbers formed from nothing are the Decad: these are seen in the fingers of the hands, five on one, five on the other, and over them is the Covenant by voice spiritual, and the rite of Circumcision, corporeal (as of Abraham). 4. Ten are the numbers of the ineffable Sephiroth, ten and not nine, ten and not eleven. Learn this wisdom, and be wise in the understanding of it, investigate these numbers, and draw knowledge from them, fix the design in its purity, and pass from it to its Creator seated on his throne. 5. These Ten Numbers, beyond the Infinite one, have the boundless realms, boundless origin and end, an abyss of good and one of evil, boundless height and depth, East and West, North and South, and the one only God and king, faithful forever seated on his throne, shall rule over all, forever and ever. 6. These ten Sephiroth which are ineffable, whose appearance is like scintillating flames, have no end but are infinite. The word of God is in them as they burst forth, and as they return; they obey the divine command, rushing along as a whirlwind, returning to prostrate themselves at his throne….”
M-Theory
The biggest academic obstacle of string theory’s 10-dimensions of space and one dimension of time is the fringe group of scientist that endorse a 11-dimensional theory, which they believe unites all the variations of string theory into one theory that would supersede them all.
M Theory speculates that this eleventh dimension is an infinitely long string, infinitely narrow, yet contains all the other dimensions within. For me, this just sounds like a simple restatement of the strictest definition of that first dimensional singularity: A body in the first dimension may be represented by a straight line. One may imagine that a point when engulfs infinite number of other points in a particular direction, it forms a straight line, a straight line that has no area or volume. Hence like a point, it also cannot be drawn, but only located, and it also has no mass as it occupies no volume."
Search for an image of M Theory’s infinitely long and infinitely narrow string and you get a ball looking object. An infinitely long string wrapped up upon itself like some form of Mobius Loop. Yet if the sting is infinitely narrow, then this ball looking object would be infinitely small – or a single point - the singularly that I maintain is at the very foundation of all dimensions.
When Edward Witten coined the name, M-theory, in 1995, he did not specify what the M stood for; perhaps because this newest theory was not yet fully defined. Originally the letter M in M-theory was taken from membrane, a construct designed to generalize the strings of string theory. However, as Witten was more skeptical about membranes than his colleagues, he opted for "M-theory" rather than "Membrane theory." Witten has since stated that the different interpretations of the M can be a matter of taste for the user, such as matrix, magic, mystery, and mother theory.
The major criticisms by M-theory’s opponents assert: M-theory is not provable. Therefore, many in the scientific community do not consider it a valid theory of science. M-theory does not explain the origin of the energy needed to create a membrane universe. In summary, opponents assert M-Theorist are trying to explain a universe we can experience and measure with an M-theory universe that we cannot experience and measure. However, those of us that have a faith based belief understand fully what the mysterious magic of the matrix truly represents – God the Father – the singularity - and that really is the mother theory of all creation. Isn’t it?
I am so fascinated with science’s inability to acknowledge the first dimensional singularity. In fact, in all of the discussion about multiple dimensions have led some to conclude that there must be an 11th dimension which looks like, acts like, and seems like just a restatement of the first dimension. What was the oppositions criticism of the M-Theorist trying to explain a universe we can experience and measure with (a first dimensional point that contains all points, an absolute omniscience singularity) which science cannot experience or measure. Do these scientists even listen to themselves? Any discussion of a multiple anything, especially multiple dimensions, must begin with the first one, the corner stone, or the building block of them all. How can you discuss the amazing boundaries of multiple dimensions, and yet, ignore the first dimension as if it doesn’t exist?